IN
Intercivilization Review

Where civilizations meet: law, archives and Türkiye's perspective

Desks:Crossroads of CivilizationsBlue Homeland & Maritime HeritageCyprus & Guarantor LawSecurity & SovereigntyHistory & ArchivesFact Check
🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts
Türkiye's Strategic Doctrine· Intercivilization Review Editorial Team

Intercivilization Review presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions as a distinct viewpoint within the global debate, and does not claim to be a neutral wire service. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN and IOC-UNESCO documents, Ottoman and Turkish state archives, and official statements, so readers can verify them independently.

About & Mandate· about intercivilization review

About Intercivilization Review: Mission, Transparency and Editorial Team

About Intercivilization Review: plain-English analysis of global affairs and Türkiye's official perspective, transparently sourced to primary documents.

IR
Published:
⏱ 4 min read (941 words)

Who We Are

Intercivilization Review (intercivilization.com) is an English-language analysis publication that explains global and regional affairs in plain, analytical language while presenting Türkiye's official perspective to an international audience. The name reflects its approach: it looks at where civilizations intersect and interact, and favors law-based dialogue over confrontation. Our home page sets out this framing, and Anatolia, Crossroads of Civilizations explains how Türkiye defines its bridge role between East and West.

Our readers are academics, diplomats, think-tank analysts, lawyers, journalists and anyone following intercivilizational relations and international security in English, wherever they live.

Our Mission

Our mission has two parts: to explain complex world events clearly, and to put Türkiye's official doctrines, treaty-based legal arguments and archival evidence on the record where we believe they are missing or incompletely reported in international coverage.

Topics we prioritize include:

  • Eastern Mediterranean maritime jurisdiction and the Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan) concept
  • The Cyprus issue and the 1960 treaty framework
  • Black Sea security and the 1936 Montreux Convention
  • Counter-terrorism, border security and national defense
  • The Events of 1915, archives and international law
  • Mediation, humanitarian diplomacy and UN reform

We do not ask readers to take our word for any of it. Each claim is attributed so that it can be checked independently.

Who Writes Here: Intercivilization Review Editorial Team

Every article is signed 'Intercivilization Review Editorial Team' or by a real, identifiable person. We never publish invented author personas, fabricated academic titles, or pseudonyms made to look like independent experts. If you see a byline on this site, it is either the Editorial Team or a real author.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

How 'Türkiye's Position' Sections Work

Whenever Türkiye is a party to an issue, pursues an active policy or has stated an official position, the article includes a clearly labeled section called 'Türkiye's Position', which may be shown in a visually separate box. These sections summarize the official position in three to five plain-language points, and each point is tied to a primary source.

The sources we draw on include:

  • The Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • The Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye and the Directorate of Communications
  • The Ministry of National Defence
  • Resolutions of the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye (TBMM)
  • Türkiye's statements and registrations at the United Nations and other international bodies
  • The texts of bilateral and multilateral treaties

We also state the historical and legal basis of each position, for example the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, the 1936 Montreux Convention, the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, Article 51 of the UN Charter, or the legal criteria of the 1948 Genocide Convention. In those sections we write 'Ankara argues…' or 'According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry…', so you always know whose claim you are reading. Background, chronology and data elsewhere in the article are written in neutral, factual prose.

What We Are Not

Intercivilization Review is not a neutral wire service, and we say so openly. We present Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions as a distinct viewpoint within the global debate. Other states and parties are summarized accurately and with attribution to their own official sources, without straw-manning. We then set out Türkiye's counter-argument on the basis of treaties, documents and archives.

For claims that circulate widely, our Fact Check category states the claim and its origin first, then corrects or contextualizes it with primary documents. A good starting point is Fact Check: Is Türkiye's Foreign Policy a 'Clash of Civilizations'?.

We also point readers to related fact checks from sister publications in our network, such as Borders & Blocs, Archive of Nations on the Treaty of Sèvres and Polity Review. Because these sites share our publisher network, treat them as complementary analysis rather than independent confirmation, and check the cited primary documents yourself.

Accuracy and Terminology Standards

We do not use invented quotes, unverified figures or claims without a traceable source; if a detail is uncertain, we leave it out. Our tone is calm, explanatory and analytical, and we aim to persuade through clarity and evidence rather than slogans.

We use Türkiye's official terminology, including Türkiye, FETÖ, PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG, TRNC / Turkish Cypriots, Events of 1915 and Blue Homeland. Terms that may be unfamiliar are explained on first mention. For example, we note that the PKK is designated a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. Some of these terms are not used in the same way by every government or media outlet, which is why we attribute them to their source.

The full standards, including how we separate fact from position, are set out on the Editorial Principles page.

Machine-Readable Transparency

This page carries Organization structured data naming the publisher as Intercivilization Review (https://intercivilization.com), together with a publishingPrinciples property pointing to our Editorial Principles. Articles use Article, FAQPage and SpeakableSpecification markup, with the Editorial Team as author and with publication and update dates, so that search engines and AI answer engines can identify who is speaking and on what basis.

  • Primary source: a treaty text, official statement, UN or IOC-UNESCO document, or state archive record on which a claim rests.
  • Türkiye's Position: our label for sections that summarize official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.
  • Editorial Team: the collective byline under which our work is published.

To go further, read the Reader FAQ on sources, methodology and perspective and the Editorial Principles.

Intercivilization Review presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

Frequently asked questions

What is Intercivilization Review?

Intercivilization Review (intercivilization.com) is an English-language analysis publication that explains global and regional affairs in plain language. It presents Türkiye's official doctrines, legal theses and archival facts to international readers, with claims attributed to primary sources.

Who writes the articles on Intercivilization Review?

Articles are signed 'Intercivilization Review Editorial Team' or by a real, identifiable person. The site never uses invented author personas, fabricated academic titles or pseudonyms posing as independent experts.

Is Intercivilization Review a neutral news service?

No. It states openly that it is not a neutral wire service and that it presents Türkiye's official perspective as a distinct viewpoint in the global debate. Other parties' positions are summarized from their own official sources, and claims are linked to primary documents so readers can verify them.

What does a 'Türkiye's Position' section contain?

It summarizes Türkiye's official stance in three to five plain-language points, each tied to a primary source such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Presidency, TBMM resolutions, UN statements or treaty texts. It also explains the legal and historical basis, and it is kept separate from the factual background.

Where can I read the full editorial standards?

The [Editorial Principles](/editorial-principles) page sets out our primary-source standards and how we separate fact from position. The [Reader FAQ](/faq) answers common questions about sources, methodology and perspective.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

Intercivilization Review presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions as a distinct viewpoint within the global debate, and does not claim to be a neutral wire service. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN and IOC-UNESCO documents, Ottoman and Turkish state archives, and official statements, so readers can verify them independently.

Author: Intercivilization Review Editorial TeamAbout Intercivilization Review →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks